|
| Postscript: Why should US boys be more violent than French boys? The above article gives some suggestions, but we can add to those suggestions: * About 60% of American boys are genitally mutilated in infancy, while French boys are overwhelmingly not. * American hospital births are more traumatic and damaging, even aside from circumcision: the USA rate of Cesarean section birth is currently at around 25%, which is 24.5% higher than it should be. Cesarean birth rates are a general indicator for the presence of other highly traumatic and invasive procedures which work a damage upon the maternal-infant bond, even when a laboring mother does not have a Cesarean. A high percentage of French births are delivered by midwives, often in out-of-hospital clinics; in the USA, only a low percentage of births are so delivered. * AIDS hysteria and sex-repressive ideology are much more widespread in the USA than in France or Europe. "Abstinence education" is a main-stay of USA public school education, whereas schools in Western Europe emphasize contraceptive methods without the sex-negative ideology. * "Don't
Touch" phobias appear more predominant in the USA, where children are more and more
brought up in environments where hugging and kissing and touching are increasingly taboo.
USA children have been expelled from school for innocently kissing, for example, and
teachers have been threatened or actually fired for hugging students. Among USA males,
homophobia is also extreme, such that a boy who hugs another boy will certainly be
ridiculed as being "queer", etc. * "Statutory Rape" laws in the USA (originally formulated to prevent the recruitment of young girls into prostitution) currently are used to put adolescent and teen boys into youth detention centers and prisons for very natural and consensual sexual expression with consenting adolescent and teen girls, whereas in France and most of Europe, such laws are appropriately applied only when forcible rape occurs. California and several other USA states now have Special Prosecutors whose sole job is to seek out and prosecute youth "statutory rape" cases, as part of the new "population control" regimen passed by Congress. If a state does not employ such Orwellian anti-sex prosecution of young males for healthy sexual expression, the State loses money ear-marked for contraceptive programs. * American parents and teachers may be more dogmatic and authori- tarian, and less demonstrably physically affectionate towards their kids than French parents and teachers, with a higher percentage of hidden sadists, reflective of a more violent background population. * American television and movies are demonstrably very violent, even for programs developed for youth. Many cartoons for boys are nothing more than mass-advertising for violent-type "action figures" modeled on the most violent adult-content movies (compare "Rambo" to "GI Joe"). Karate-type, wrestling and shoot-em-up police-criminal-violence programs occur during all hours of television, and young boys in the USA are often seen to mimic such media violence in their interactions. * The same hypocritical President who authored and signed into law the above "Special Sex-Prosecutors for Kids" laws, also fired Jocelyn Elders, former Surgeon General, for openly saying that masturbation was OK for youth. Americans were not detectably bothered by these extremely sex-repressive actions of the President, but many were extremely bothered to learn the President had a consensual extra-marital affair, to the point of demanding his resignation and/or impeachment. This suggests that many/most Americans generally agree that adolescent sexual expression of any kind is a very bad thing sometimes requiring hard jail time, and that Public Health officials who dare to publicly favor adolescent sexual pleasure should also be strongly punished -- and that extra-marital sex should also be punished. What are French attitudes towards masturbation? The above factors, and general knowledge of French openness towards physical nudity on beaches, in magazine advertisements, and towards sexual matters in general, suggest they view adolescent sexual expression more positively than do Americans. Obviously many of the above points require additional cross-cultural examination, but for the most part they are already demonstrated in various cross-cultural studies. See my book Saharasia
for more details, and extensive citations for similar cross-cultural studies demonstrating
sex-repressive factors underlying youth violence and social violence in general. |
Another article on youth violence
Back to. . .
Asheville Magazine
| Chattanooga
Spirit